- From: <niko@nextgraph.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:11:50 +0200
- To: public-crdt4rdf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <648f83ff-766a-423a-b542-d348162fc14f@nextgraph.org>
Hi George, Glad to see you here! The link you just shared refers to a document listing "intentions" for your system. It is nice to read them, but it doesn't describe the exact CRDT mechanism you have implemented. If you have a paper with formal proof of the CRDT model, or if you can detail in few lines which conflict resolution mechanism you employ and what makes it a CRDT, that would be helpful for us to understand more in details how it differentiates from the other solutions represented here in this group. Looking forward reading more about your CRDT for RDF, Cheers, Niko On 24/11/24 1:45 pm, George Svarovsky wrote: > Hi crdt4rdf > > Thanks for setting up this group and I hope I can contribute. > > I'm the author of https://m-ld.org/, which specifies* and implements > an RDF graph CRDT. I worked on m-ld full time from April 2020 to > December 2023, and it's being maintained pending interest and funding. > > (* the specification in spec.m-ld.org, referenced in the WG homepage, > has not been completed. It might be better to reference the more > generic mission statement in https://pattern.m-ld.org/.) > > Perhaps it would be best for me to make a new post introducing m-ld > itself with particular reference to the goals of this WG. > > Best wishes to all > George >
Attachments
- application/pgp-keys attachment: OpenPGP public key
Received on Sunday, 24 November 2024 12:12:19 UTC