- From: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 08:43:06 +0100
- To: public-crdt4rdf@w3.org
Hi Niko, > And welcome here! I am Niko, the author of NextGraph.org maybe you heard > about it recently. > > I am glad you have an interest for distributed datasets and that you > implemented something similar to an append-only log of changes for RDF. > And the format is similar to what NextGraph is doing, as I could see. > you use a set of added quads and a set of deleted quads for each change. I had already a brief look at NextGraph.org, but I haven't had the time yet to try it. > In your repo, you write "Any conflicts of previously added/deleted quads > in the same changeset are solved." > > I didn't have time to read your code to find out how the conflict > resolution is done. > Could you detail it for us ? It is an important detail if we want to > understand if you solution is a CRDT. I think *conflict* is the wrong word when I read it now. The changelog of a single transaction is condensed by deleting delete/add pairs of the same quad would be correct. The package is not a CRDT and doesn't implement a conflict resolution logic. Best, bergi
Received on Friday, 22 November 2024 07:43:20 UTC