Solid specs for CRDT

Hello everyone,

Apart from the very important and generic topic on how to make CRDTs for 
RDF, I am sharing with you my thoughts and proposal on how CRDT could be 
added to the Solid specs.

On the generic topic of conflict resolution mechanism for RDF, maybe 
Hala Skaf-Molli could give us an overview of the available options? I 
have implemented SU-set in NextGraph, which is an Observed remove set 
(insert wins over delete). But maybe there are other ways of conflict 
resolution mechanism for RDF ?

In the meanwhile, I share with you the Use-Case issue I created for the 
W3C Linked Web Storage WG, where I am talking about bringing another 
level of abstraction for the APIs in the Solid specs.

I believe that there is a fundamental difference between the approach 
used in NextGraph and the one we have seen so far in other attempts at 
bringing CRDT to Solid, and I try to explain this in the Github issue.
Let's discuss here what you think about this proposal, i you want :)

https://github.com/w3c/lws-ucs/issues/24


Wishing you all a good end of the year!

Cheers,

Niko

Received on Monday, 9 December 2024 00:02:53 UTC