- From: Owen Ambur <owen.ambur@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 17:53:15 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Mohith Agadi | Fact Protocol <mohith@fact.technology>, Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
- Cc: "public-council@w3.org" <public-council@w3.org>, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>, Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Manoj Agadi <support@fact.technology>, Ajit Nongmaithem <nong.ajit@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <1081882903.4069668.1737741195464@mail.yahoo.com>
While I don't understand the technical details of this exchange, with the assistance of Claude.ai, Fact Protocol's about statment is now available in StratML format at https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#FCTP or, more specifically, https://stratml.us/docs/FCTP.xml Tomorrow it will also be discoverable at https://search.aboutthem.info/ I will look forward to learning more about how it relates not only to StratML-enabled query services but also the concept of Truly Connected CoRs (communities of results). From my perspective, the potential looks transformationally tremendous, not just in terms of evaluating what individuals, groups, and organizations say but, more importantly, what they intend to do and how well they actually do it. Owen Amburhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/ On Friday, January 24, 2025 at 11:31:05 AM EST, Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com> wrote: Mohith, Hello. These ideas are as of yet untested. Yes, you and anyone else can give them a try. Best regards,AdamFrom: Mohith Agadi | Fact Protocol <mohith@fact.technology> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 10:18 AM To: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com> Cc: public-council@w3.org <public-council@w3.org>; Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>; Owen Ambur <owen.ambur@verizon.net>; Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>; Mohith Agadi <mohith@fact.technology>; Manoj Agadi <support@fact.technology>; Ajit Nongmaithem <nong.ajit@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Decentralized Fact-checking & Provenance Organization (DeFacto) Community Group launched Adam, On your idea, have you tested it with any CMS before? If not, can we give it a try? "P.S.: On these technical topics of decentralized fact-checking, I would like to share some ideas about uses of custom elements with other JavaScript libraries to enable visual indicators to be provided for each asserted fact or claim such that end-users would be able to both quickly consult these visual indicators and open context menus on them to obtain more information. These custom elements could utilize something resembling Magnet URIs (or an extension to these for using embedding vectors or derived data). <verifiable-fact see="magnet:?xv=...">Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.</verifiable-fact> These custom elements could also be interoperable with blockchain-based technologies. How might content authors easily enter facts or claims into their documents? With respect to popular content-management systems, the syntax for so doing might resemble that of existing shortcodes like [quote]. [fact]Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.[/fact] As considered, during content-publishing processes, authors' content-management systems (e.g., Drupal, WordPress) or configurable plugins or extensions for these systems would handle searching for existing paraphrases, adding new facts or claims (if needed), obtaining the data for use in the see attributes, caching these data, and generating markup documents." Best Regards, Mohith AgadiCo-founder, Fact Protocol E: mohith@fact.technologyP: +1-302-365-0606 (WhatsApp)P: +91-9035211411W: https://fact.technology/ Connect with me on:Twitter | LinkedIn On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 07:00 Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com> wrote: Owen,All, Hello. I'm also eager to learn more about the new group, its vision, potential synergies with existing groups, and plans with respect to specifications. Best regards,Adam P.S.: On these technical topics of decentralized fact-checking, I would like to share some ideas about uses of custom elements with other JavaScript libraries to enable visual indicators to be provided for each asserted fact or claim such that end-users would be able to both quickly consult these visual indicators and open context menus on them to obtain more information. These custom elements could utilize something resembling Magnet URIs (or an extension to these for using embedding vectors or derived data). <verifiable-fact see="magnet:?xv=...">Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.</verifiable-fact> These custom elements could also be interoperable with blockchain-based technologies. How might content authors easily enter facts or claims into their documents? With respect to popular content-management systems, the syntax for so doing might resemble that of existing shortcodes like[quote]. [fact]Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.[/fact] As considered, during content-publishing processes, authors' content-management systems (e.g., Drupal, WordPress) or configurable plugins or extensions for these systems would handle searching for existing paraphrases, adding new facts or claims (if needed), obtaining the data for use in the see attributes, caching these data, and generating markup documents. From: Owen Ambur <owen.ambur@verizon.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 2:40 PM To: public-council@w3.org <public-council@w3.org>; Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com> Cc: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>; Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>; Mohith Agadi <mohith@fact.technology>; Manoj Agadi <support@fact.technology>; Ajit Nongmaithem <nong.ajit@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Decentralized Fact-checking & Provenance Organization (DeFacto) Community Group launched I defer to others to answer this question. However, the initiatives considered by the CredWeb CG are documented in StratML format athttps://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#CWCG I look forward to: a) rendering this group's plan in StratML format as well,b) using the stratml:Relationship elements to document and link its performance indicators to other efforts, andc) documenting any results the group may produce. Whether I decide to participate in the group will depend upon the degree to which it decides to consider the revelvance of sharing performance metrics in an open, standard, machine-readable format. In that regard, ChatGPT concludes: ... StratML embodies the principles of trust, transparency, scalability, and provenance—core values that resonate deeply with the group's vision statement. Publishing the DFCP’s strategic and performance documents in StratML format would not only align with but also actively support the realization of its vision and mission. The details of ChatGPT's logic leading to that conclusion are available here. Needless to say, I believe the purposes of all of the W3C's groups would be well served by publishing their performance plans and reports in open, standard, machine-readable format. Owen Amburhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/ On Wednesday, January 8, 2025 at 01:13:52 PM EST, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com> wrote: How does this overlap with the Credible Web CG at https://www.w3.org/community/credibility/, which https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/483 says is the likely place to investigate provenance questions? On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:06 AM <public-council@w3.org> wrote: With your support, the Decentralized Fact-checking & Provenance Organization (DeFacto) Community Group has been launched: https://www.w3.org/community/defacto/ This group was originally proposed on 2024-12-14 by Mohith Agadi. The following people supported its creation: Raphaël Troncy Adam Sobieski Mohith Agadi Manoj Agadi Ajit Nongmaithem To join the group, please use: https://www.w3.org/community/defacto/join Please note that supporting a group is different from joining a group. Supporters must also enroll if they wish to participate. -------------------- The Decentralized Fact-checking & Provenance Working Group (DFCP) is committed to actively researching, developing, building, maintaining, managing, upgrading, and implementing robust amendments for a decentralized fact-checking system and stringent provenance standards for text-based literature and content. We will drive this initiative forward with determination and efficacy. DFCP strives to empower societies with tools to identify and mitigate/counter misinformation, disinformation, and Fake News at scale. This group will publish Specifications. -------------------- Thank you, W3C Community Development Team
Received on Friday, 24 January 2025 17:53:24 UTC