- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:46:04 -0600
- To: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Cc: public-council@w3.org
On 1 Dec 2012, at 10:38 PM, Renato Iannella wrote: > > On 30 Nov 2012, at 04:39, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > >> *some copyright topics (cc-by groups, moving cla/fsa to cc-by, and alternative copyright licensing). > > We would need to understand what is currently wrong with the current IP arrangements to warrant such a change... There is clear evidence that asking people to sign a patent licensing agreement in situations that don't require patent licensing is unnecessary and burdensome. > >> * distinguishing CG deliverables from WG deliverables. > > We are ok with the general class called "Report" and we prefer the use of "Specification" in the sub-title (ie status), as our community expects our reports to be implemented. For example: http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/two/xml/ > Thanks, Renato! Ian > > Cheers... > Renato Iannella > Chair, W3C ODRL Community Group > http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/ > > Semantic Identity > http://semanticidentity.com > Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2012 16:46:08 UTC