- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:55:51 -0500
- To: "ext SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
- CC: "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
On 1/31/13 9:48 AM, ext SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] > > I thought that was the raison d'être of webplatform.org. Surely we don't > want a duplicated effort. > > Bryan: that can be considered, e.g. re fitness for purpose, but AFAIK has not been discussed yet in CoreMob. But wouldn't moving stakeholder discussion to there also compete with the CG concept, and devalue it? No, I think focusing developers to webplatform.org is the most efficient use of resources. > There are also key rules/procedure differences between the CG's and webplatform.org. Well, I consider that a bug that needs to be fixed and if there really are mobile-specific aspects of a spec/API, that be called-out in the appropriate documentation at webplatform.org. -Cheers, AB
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:56:26 UTC