- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:29:20 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "ext SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
On 1/22/13 5:23 PM, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org> wrote: >Le mardi 22 janvier 2013 à 16:18 +0000, Tobie Langel a écrit : >> >Le mardi 22 janvier 2013 à 10:26 -0500, Arthur Barstow a écrit : >> >> Re the data in the "W3C Test Framework" column of the "CoreMob 2012" >> >> Tab, the data is an absolute number of tests. In addition to that >> >> number, I think it would also be useful to get a sense of the level >>of >> >> the test suite's "done-ness". For example: the test suite is >> >> sufficiently complete to test CR exit criteria, the test suite is >> >> partially complete, contributions needed, etc. >> > >> >FWIW, I've tried to do that analysis as part of my "state of mobile web >> >standards" document http://www.w3.org/2012/11/mobile-web-app-state/ , >> >marking the test suites coverage on a mostly-guess basis. I would love >> >to instead get that info from the groups themselves :) >> >> Or better yet, automate the whole process. > >That would be much better indeed, but requires a significantly bigger >investment too :) Agreed. Yet there's a tipping point where automation becomes cheaper.
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 16:29:55 UTC