- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 23:24:25 +0000
- To: Jet Villegas <jet@mozilla.com>
- CC: "robin@berjon.com" <robin@berjon.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>, "jason@cloudfour.com" <jason@cloudfour.com>, jeanfrancois moy <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
On 5/4/12 12:27 AM, "Jet Villegas" <jet@mozilla.com> wrote: >I think there is great value in promoting a mobile-centric feature-driven >matrix. Not all mobile phone web apps require all of ring 0, but a >specific app may well need a feature in an outer ring or completely fail. >Authors should be able to see how much of ring x is available even as >lower rings aren't filled out. In other words, let all the tests run. That's easy, just navigate to: http://rng.io/?all >As far as features go, it seems that the current ring organization >encourages vendors to get "green" and not actual spec compliance. I don't understand how these two aspects are related. If you're suggesting the tests aren't complete, I fully agree and your contribution are welcome. >I'd like to see real grading there and not a boolean "pass" condition. >This will make correctness of a feature weigh more than its presence. I'm not sure what you mean by this either, unfortunately. --tobie
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 23:25:27 UTC