- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 19:37:21 +0200
- To: jason@cloudfour.com, jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com
- Cc: tobie@fb.com, robin@berjon.com, public-coremob@w3.org
On Thu, 03 May 2012 10:50:25 +0200, <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com> wrote: > It's simply two different ways of thinking. I like to think that it is > good practice to have a clear overview of the current state of the > mobile web platform. Once this has been achieved and agreed, we can > then proceed by iteration to build the next levels. That would be nice. I don't see any consensus that what is in level zero is particularly close to being that basis, and I believe that it will take more work to make it so than the value it provides. Dropping level zero as something that we couldn't do effectively seems worth while. cheers > On Wed 02 May 2012 22:33:55 BST, Jason Grigsby wrote: >> On May 2, 2012, at 10:21 AM,<jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com> >> <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com> wrote: >> >>> I don't agree with using the level 0 as a target. To define following >>> levels, we need a base and that is the purpose of the level 0; It acts >>> as a starting line for the rest of this community group work. >> >> I’m sorry. I don’t mean to be dense, but why is a base necessary? >> Without it, what won’t the group be able to work on? >> >> -Jason -- Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan noen norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 17:38:14 UTC