- From: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:01:51 +0100
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "<jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com>" <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
On 29 Mar 2012, at 22:35, Tobie Langel wrote: > On 3/29/12 11:22 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > >> Having said that, it might be quicker to just define an alternative JSON >> serialisation of the Widget's XML format. That's currently the domain of >> the Native Web Apps community group [1] (as chair of the CG, and editor >> of the Widget specs, happy to help!), as WebApps membership generally >> finds the widget work toxic so don't expect any support there (though >> ironically all browser vendors ship a widget/browser-extension platform >> of one sort or another). > > There expressed interest by Mozilla and Opera to tackle this issue. Let's > see how it goes. Or just publish Rich's thing as a Note and have done. Its not exactly rocket science. I doubt anyone in practice would want to write a config.json file for their app, but I don't think we're dealing with practical concerns here. > > --tobie > >
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 22:02:24 UTC