Re: Rough first draft of Level 0

On 3/28/12 5:57 PM, "jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com"
<jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com> wrote:

>* Codecs are evil but I think their support must be mentioned. It is
> good as a developer to be sure that the video/audio format you use is
>going to be widely supported. We have seen with the recent experience of
> Mozilla and Firefox Mobile that they have been pushed to announce a
>future support of H264.

We're still debating how to mention codecs without encumbering the spec
with patents. Maybe non-normatively as guidance to implementors?
  
>* Quite surprised to see some platform specific meta tags in the
>level 0 as the introduction states that the document is not platform
>centric, but web centric. Also, I agree that these tags are useful and I
> would welcome their inclusion in other platforms but ring 0 is supposed
> to be the current state. Would not it be more coherent to put them in
>the ring 1 if we decided to include them?

Vendor-prefixed Meta tags were included by accident. We're hoping to get
something like AppConfig included in Level 1 instead.

Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 17:31:07 UTC