- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:50:19 +0000
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluckco@gmail.com>, Core Mobile Web Platform CG <public-coremob@w3.org>
Hi Kenny, Thanks for your feedback. > On 3/1/12 7:17 AM, "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluckco@gmail.com> wrote: > A comment/question on the charter: > > # These are some of the indicative criteria which the CG will use to > select features to be included in the > # Specification: > # 1. The feature is already widely deployed, This is just one of the possible criteria for inclusion. The criteria are indicative only and a feature doesn't need to match any of them to be considered for inclusion. > This seems to indicate that a "feature" is something that's already > widely implemented by the browser vendors. However, this part > > # All normative content will be specified exclusively by reference to > the original standard defining the > # feature. Additional non-normative implementation guidance may be > included. > > seems to indicate that we are looking at new "features" the Core Mobile > Web Platform needs. I think you're misreading this. What it means is that it is not the role of the CG to write specs for new features. Only to list a subset of existing specs that implementors should support so that developers know what they can rely on. > So, are we trying to compile a handbook for new > developers so that they can use HTML5 as a platform for mobile > applications or are we trying to prioritize new features for browser > vendors? Or are we doing both and this depends on the "level" we are at? > I think this should be clarified. Well, both really. There's a need to describe the current state of the world, as there is a need to improve it. > I came to this mailing list after reading Brendan Eich's post entitled > "Community-Prioritized Web Standards" but I don't see the word > "prioritize" in the charter, so I am now a bit confused. It's right there, the first Goal of the CG at the top of the charter: "Agree on core features developers can depend on." Hope this helps, --tobie
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 09:50:52 UTC