- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:53:21 -0600
- To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
- Cc: "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 13:54:14 UTC
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:54 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com> wrote: > Not IMO. HTTPbis is too early in the dev cycle and the impact on existing > services has not been fully analyzed. For specific sites that want to use > it that's fine, but it is not ready as a general requirement. > Bryan Sullivan | AT&T I agree. Too early. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group Issue Tracker [mailto: > sysbot+tracker@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 05:16 PM > To: public-coremob@w3.org <public-coremob@w3.org> > Subject: ISSUE-28: Should the HTTP11 reference go to bis? > > ISSUE-28: Should the HTTP11 reference go to bis? > > http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/track/issues/28 > > Raised by: > On product: > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 13:54:14 UTC