- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:57:54 +0000
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>, "Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
On 6/19/12 2:04 PM, "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com> wrote: >On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:24:12 +0200, Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com> wrote: > >> On 6/19/12 11:11 AM, "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com> wrote: >> >>> So being able to request a view-mode? That's in the widgets P&C >>>although >>> it sounds like there is a goal to seperate config from packaging and be >>> able to use live web content. That has been expressed before (and is >>>the >>> conceptual difference between widgets on the one hand appcache and the >>> proposed JSON packaging manifest offers on the other, the rest being a >>> matter of syntax and implementation quality). >> >> I think we agree this is the way forward. > >OK. > >>> The place for that might be the native-web-apps community group. >> >> or the WebApps WG? I'm confused. > >Either. Web Apps agreed to take work that is ready-ish for >standardisation, while letting the CG work on things that are basically >new ideas. We should just agree where to go with this. I don't care either way. Are all stakeholders in both groups? --tobie
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 15:58:47 UTC