Friday, 29 June 2012
Thursday, 28 June 2012
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
Thursday, 28 June 2012
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
- ISSUE-30: Should the document track the testing effort or not
- ISSUE-29: What are the requirements for a test framework?
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-17: Resolution-friendly image format (for responsive images) [COREMOB-1]
- Re: [F2F] Conf bridge
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-17: Resolution-friendly image format (for responsive images) [COREMOB-1]
- Re: ISSUE-28: Should the HTTP11 reference go to bis?
- Re: ISSUE-27: Should Level 1 include SSE?
- Re: ISSUE-27: Should Level 1 include SSE?
- Re: ISSUE-27: Should Level 1 include SSE?
- Re: ISSUE-28: Should the HTTP11 reference go to bis?
- Re: ISSUE-27: Should Level 1 include SSE?
- Re: ISSUE-27: Should Level 1 include SSE?
- ISSUE-28: Should the HTTP11 reference go to bis?
- ISSUE-27: Should Level 1 include SSE?
- ISSUE-26: Should we include the Vibration API?
- ISSUE-25: Should Level 1 include Web Intents?
- ISSUE-24: Should we require Proximity Events?
Monday, 25 June 2012
- ISSUE-23: Is there an alternative to FileWriter? FileSaver? Something else?
- ISSUE-22: Do we consider 3D in scope under 3.4 Animations?
- ISSUE-21: Is 3D in scope under 3.2 Layout?
- ISSUE-20: We need to have a way to express how conformance interacts with the availability of hardware
- Re: ISSUE-19: Lack of a push notification system, important feature, but no sufficient specification at this time
- Re: ISSUE-19: Lack of a push notification system, important feature, but no sufficient specification at this time
- ISSUE-19: Lack of a push notification system, important feature, but no sufficient specification at this time
- ISSUE-18: Should "core features" actually be core at Level 1, or should we just consider features (in Level 1 Intro)
- [F2F] Conf bridge
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-7: No spec to point to for View orientation [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-17: Resolution-friendly image format (for responsive images) [COREMOB-1]
- Re: Evolving ringmark
- Re: Evolving ringmark
Friday, 22 June 2012
- Evolving ringmark
- Re: Feature Test Listing/Comparison: Modernizr, Ringmark, and Can I Use
- Re: Vendor prefixes
- REMINDER, ENDS TODAY: Survey: Restaurant on Monday night
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
Thursday, 21 June 2012
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
- RE: Feature Test Listing/Comparison: Modernizr, Ringmark, and Can I Use
- Vendor prefixes
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-1: AppCaches fix planned for HTML.next only [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- [coremob/level-1] 1c4504: Integrating chaals' feedback on coremob-ISSUE-6.
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-6: Application Configuration file [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-1: AppCaches fix planned for HTML.next only [COREMOB-1]
Monday, 18 June 2012
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- coremob-ISSUE-16: [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-15: Do we need both Shared and Web Workers? [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-14: XHR level 1 and 2 specs [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-13: CSS Text is in WD [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-12: Flexbox is a WD [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-7: No spec to point to for View orientation [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-11: No spec effort around momentum scrolling [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-10: CSS Image Values is a CR [COREMOB-1]
- Re: coremob-ISSUE-7: No spec to point to for View orientation [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-9: CSS Values is still a WD [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-7: No spec to point to for View orientation [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-6: Application Configuration file [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-5: CSS-ADAPTATION spec currently marked as exploratory [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-4: HTML Media Capture `capture` attribute is just a "hint"
- coremob-ISSUE-3: HTML Media Capture is just a Working Draft [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-2: Latency requirements for playing an audio file [COREMOB-1]
- coremob-ISSUE-1: AppCaches fix planned for HTML.next only [COREMOB-1]
Friday, 15 June 2012
- Re: [F2F] Agenda
- Re: [F2F] Agenda
- [COREMOB-1] New updated draft
- [F2F] Agenda
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
Tuesday, 12 June 2012
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
Monday, 11 June 2012
- RE: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- RE: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
- Re: Ringmark, Core Mobile, and the Financial Times
Sunday, 10 June 2012
Saturday, 9 June 2012
Friday, 8 June 2012
Thursday, 7 June 2012
Friday, 8 June 2012
- Re: on requiring origin request header?
- [coremob/level-0] 1fb97c: Shelve spec.
- Re: Chair transition: Tobie to Jo
- Re: on requiring origin request header?
- RE: on requiring origin request header?
- Re: on requiring origin request header?
Thursday, 7 June 2012
- Re: on requiring origin request header?
- Re: Chair transition: Tobie to Jo
- Re: on requiring origin request header?
- Re: on requiring origin request header?
- Re: on requiring origin request header?
- RE: Chair transition: Tobie to Jo
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
- Re: Chair transition: Tobie to Jo
- Re: Chair transition: Tobie to Jo
- on requiring origin request header?
- Chair transition: Tobie to Jo
- [F2F] Wiki page
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
Monday, 4 June 2012
- RE: Standards for Web Applications on Mobile, May 2012
- Re: Standards for Web Applications on Mobile, May 2012
- Re: F2F registration
- Re: F2F registration
- Standards for Web Applications on Mobile, May 2012
- Re: F2F registration
Saturday, 2 June 2012
Friday, 1 June 2012
- Re: Coremob F2F, 25-27 June [via Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group]
- F2F registration
- Re: F2F meeting