Monday, 30 April 2012
- RE: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source)
- [coremob/level-1] dc596b: Add View Orientation API section.
- [coremob/level-1] 45e68a: Add section for Media Capture API.
- Acknowledging prefixes as not a pass, was Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source)
- Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source)
Friday, 27 April 2012
Wednesday, 25 April 2012
Tuesday, 24 April 2012
- Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source)
- Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source)
- Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source)
Monday, 23 April 2012
- Re: Against touch events...
- Re: Missing text entry
- Re: Against touch events...
- Re: Missing text entry
- Against touch events...
- Missing text entry
Wednesday, 18 April 2012
- Re: [coremob/level-0] df3f70: Replace incorrect use of "MUST [...] if available"...
- Re: [coremob/level-0] df3f70: Replace incorrect use of "MUST [...] if available"...
- Re: [coremob/level-0] df3f70: Replace incorrect use of "MUST [...] if available"...
Tuesday, 17 April 2012
- Re: [coremob/level-0] df3f70: Replace incorrect use of "MUST [...] if available"...
- Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source)
Monday, 16 April 2012
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
Friday, 13 April 2012
- [coremob/level-0] df3f70: Replace incorrect use of "MUST […] if available"...
- [coremob/level-0] 83c557: Add a sotd section.
Monday, 16 April 2012
Sunday, 15 April 2012
Saturday, 14 April 2012
Friday, 13 April 2012
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- [coremob/level-0] d03107: skeleton draft
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source
Thursday, 12 April 2012
- Opera mini ain't just for feature phones, was Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Different approach, Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- The meat, Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
Wednesday, 11 April 2012
- Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source
- How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Proxy-based Web browsers (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source)
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
Tuesday, 10 April 2012
- Re: Potential mailing list issues [via Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group]
- Re: Potential mailing list issues [via Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group]
Monday, 9 April 2012
Sunday, 8 April 2012
Friday, 6 April 2012
Thursday, 5 April 2012
- Re: Mail List Policy concerning replies
- RE: Mail List Policy concerning replies
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Mail List Policy concerning replies
Wednesday, 4 April 2012
Thursday, 5 April 2012
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- AW: Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- RE: Ringmark is now open source
Wednesday, 4 April 2012
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Potential mailing list issues [via Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group]
- RE: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- RE: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- RE: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Charter amendment proposal
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- Re: Ringmark is now open source
- RE: Ringmark is now open source
- RE: Ringmark is now open source
- RE: Ringmark is now open source
Tuesday, 3 April 2012
Monday, 2 April 2012
Tuesday, 3 April 2012
Monday, 2 April 2012
Sunday, 1 April 2012
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0
- Re: Rough first draft of Level 0