RE: [W3C AB synch & consistency] about annotation

We discussed both, but I was more looking for the experimentation part of Annotation.
V


-----Original Message-----
From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ [mailto:perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org]
Sent: vendredi 5 décembre 2014 11:03
To: public-coord-mechanisms@w3.org
Subject: Re: [W3C AB synch & consistency] about annotation

On 12/03/2014 03:20 PM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> FYI.
>
> During our call this week, we briefly mentioned the idea of
> annotation, as a possible mean to include information in
> specifications. The experimentation made on a W3C specification we
> mentioned is here www.w3.org/2014/annotation/experiment/webaudio.html
> <http://www.w3.org/2014/annotation/experiment/webaudio.html>
I don't remember if we spoke only about audio annotations or general web annotation? http://www.w3.org/annotation/



________________________________
 This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.

Received on Friday, 5 December 2014 10:13:46 UTC