W3 Consent Experts: Invite to Comment on Digital Trust: NIST IR 8480: Attribute Validation Services for Identity Management Architecture

Dear W3 Consent WG,

There is finally a paper up for comment, which for the first time enters into the relative field of personal data control over identifiers and attributes, aka Digital Trust. It presents 3 deployment architectures in the field along with the implementation of the concept of Consent which could really open up the digital trust discussion, An opportunity for this WG to have a voice about consent,

This paper "NIST IR 8480: Attribute Validation Services for Identity Management Architecture, Security, Privacy, and Operational Considerations” [Internet Accessible at https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/ir/8480/ipd ]

The deadline for comments, has been extended from tomorrow to Dec 2nd, and I am discussing with a keen interest in digital trust with consent a joint strategy on to team up with on key comments forward, where in we can put forward comments that might compliment corresponding work efforts in parallel field.

In particular, OpenID Foundation, DIACC with the PCTF, OpenID Foundation, and the Kantara Initiative ANCR WG, A W3C Consent WG comments, and browser considerate perspective would be quite valuable to NIST presents a significant opportunity to submit some comments as a W3C group. This would entail not the regular - put in all the comments, and say what ever we think style of WG input thus far demonstrated, Although each one of us are important, have a perspective and a role to play, this call to action would entail a mandate in which the comments were curated to support at the W3 (Web Consent Perspective) aka digital consent. These comments would need to a) find a consensus amongst this diverse group b) be appropriate to support the W3 position and ecosystem,

To this end, I would like to invite interested parties to review this document, and if interested, discuss, draft and agree a W# Consent set of comments, While also, not prohibiting, but in fact encouraging, any member of this CG to put forward independently any comments that you can see are important, from either a personal or organisational perspective and position, with support from this group.

If you are interested, and because time is relatively short, I propose that interested parties review the doc, and, we organise an adhoc set of meetings for the next 3 Thursday’s - at 10 am (eastern) for 45 min.

Draft Objective for the meetings:
1. Meeting 1 to discuss the paper
2. Meeting 2 to draft and or review draft comments
3. Meeting 3 agree and share with counterparts (if any) to prep - and then submit comments

While this could be seen as a bit ambitious or optimistic, it is my opinion that this is extremely important paper at the core of what digital consent is l about, perhaps even a raison d’etra opportunity to express a W3 Consent point of view.

Regardless, it is a way for us to come to explore a understanding of the technical purposes behind the work, its significance to huamanity, and to support a multi-community path where we can collectively team up a as a consortia of experts to drive digital consent and personal data control forward in a way that scales the Internet,

Here is the [Meeting Link](https://teams.live.com/meet/9337304751367?p=weO1qtfKzAcPxaDa9W) for next Thursday at 5pm

Lets make a difference!

Mark Lizar
Executive Director
Transparency, Surveillance & Consent Lab
@ Global Privacy Rights

Mark Lizar invited you to a Microsoft Teams Meeting:

W3 Consent CG-AD Hoc 4 - NIST Comments
14, 21, 28 November 2024
10:00 - 1o:45 (EST) ="auto">

Meeting link: [ANCR WG-AD Hoc -NIST Comments | Microsoft Teams | Meet-up-Join](https://teams.live.com/meet/9337304751367?p=weO1qtfKzAcPxaDa9W)="auto">="auto">="display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:start;align-items:start;padding:03%3%3%;">

Received on Friday, 8 November 2024 04:10:35 UTC