- From: Devarshi Pant <devarshipant@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:43:16 -0400
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJGQbjvNHKW+SDz_QspCVQv+B2e44TRrBbe1VEMLk7qku3T2mw@mail.gmail.com>
Originally posted in the w3c-wai-ig@w3.org interest group. Re posting it as the use of H37 listed under Situations A and B remains unclear: I have a question regarding some situations listed under "Sufficient Techniques for 1.1.1 - Non-text Content" -- http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/#text-equiv, namely, Situation A: If a short description can serve (supported by G94 etc.)... and Situation B: If a short description cannot serve (supported by G95 etc.)... Question: Can someone decide on the basis of the length of text string if a short description can 'serve' or 'cannot serve' the same purpose as the non-text content? For example, wouldn't it be more helpful to know to use Situation A when the short description is less than 200 char etc.? A case in point - H37 is listed under both Situations A and B, which means that although not suitable, a 1200 char length alt attribute on a chart (Situation B) can be implemented to claim conformance. Basically, how short should be a short description? -Devarshi
Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 14:44:13 UTC