- From: <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:57:37 +0000
- To: Devarshi Pant <devarshipant@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Dear Devarshi Pant , The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Techniques for WCAG 2.0 published on 5 Sep 2013. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments! The Working Group's response to your comment is included below. Please review it carefully and let us know by email at public-comments-wcag20@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 21 January 2014. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track. Thanks, For the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group, Michael Cooper W3C Staff Contact 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/CAJGQbjsKHgEeXBW9Vkr9-88kY5DK5ai6cPcrLBBUTvXQ3oTg9w@mail.gmail.com 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20130905/ ===== Your comment on SCR21: Using functions of the Document Object Model (DOM) to add content t...: > Refer to “User Agent and Assistive Technology Support Notes” in > SCR21 - > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20130905/SCR21 > > The use of the word ‘insure’ seems incorrect. 'Ensure' would be > more > suitable. > > -Devarshi Working Group Resolution (LC-2856): Thank you for your comment, we will make this change as suggested. ----
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 20:57:39 UTC