- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:43:42 -0700
- To: detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHu5OWZLsZFVt01j=s=3S5bOsqGvvrGFkftpwhubnrb_53WqEQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:20 AM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote: > Name: Detlev Fischer > Email: detlev.fischer@testkreis.de > Affiliation: 3needs > Document: TD > Item Number: F41 > Part of Item: Applicability > Comment Type: general comment > Summary of Issue: For longer time-outs, would not a cntrol that removes > automatic refresh meet the SC? > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > The Failure test just looks for meta http-equiv with value "refresh" and > content > 0. I can see a scenario where the value of content is high (say, > 1200 = 20 minutes) and a control is available to extend or turn off > auto-refresh (e.g., via DOM scripting of the meta http-eqiv content > attribute). In that case, it seems to me that SC 2.2.1 would be met. Would > F41 nit need to be updated to reflect that option, also in the test > procedure? > > Proposed Change: > Not sure - if my argument holds, the test would need to check whether a > page actually get refreshed (either by inspecting the content value or, if > it is done server-side, by waiting (how long a wait is sensible I am not > sure, 20 mins?), and, if the page is found to refresh, look out for a > control to extend or turn off the time limit. If a refresh takes place and > there is a working control giving uders enough time to locate it, the > Failure would not apply. > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ RE control to stop refresh: We agree that if a control exists to stop it -- the page would not fail. RE Very long refresh time: This is a hard one to judge. What is a very long time? If the average user takes 20 minutes to complete it -- then 20 is not a long time. But more to the point, the SC does not say "or a very long time". It does say 20 HOURS. But not 20 min or 'a long time'. So a) We are changing "If the time interval is too short, " in the introduction to "If the time interval is too short, and there is no way to turn auto-refresh off" b) We are making the following changes to the test procedure 3) check to see if there is a mechanism to turn off the refresh. Expected Result - If step 2 is true and step 3 is false then this failure condition applies and content fails these Success Criteria. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Monday, 29 October 2012 22:44:10 UTC