public-comments-wcag20@w3.org from February 2011 by date

Monday, 28 February 2011

• Errata page at http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/ noreply@w3.org

Thursday, 24 February 2011

• Editorial Errors in WCAG Techniques Tomas Caspers

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

• Link to SC 3.1.2 links to Guideline 3.1 noreply@w3.org

Monday, 21 February 2011

• None currently documented should not be there noreply@w3.org
• (None currently documented) stands at the beginning of examples, although examples are available noreply@w3.org

Saturday, 19 February 2011

• I feel that the 2 sufficient techniques should be 'and' not 'or'. noreply@w3.org

Thursday, 17 February 2011

• Sufficient techniques- definition and guidance Sailesh Panchang

Wednesday, 16 February 2011

• H89: certainly cannot be a sufficient technique Sailesh Panchang

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

• Editorial Errors in Understanding WCAG Tomas Caspers

Saturday, 12 February 2011

• no link to single file from http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/Overview.html noreply@w3.org

Thursday, 3 February 2011

• Editorial Errors in Understanding WCAG Tomas Caspers

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2011 14:37:35 UTC