W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > August 2009

G182: Example 1(1st bullet)

From: <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:17:15 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20090827081715.950BA6B646@tibor.w3.org>

Name: Makoto Ueki
Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
Affiliation: Infoaxia, Inc.
Document: TD
Item Number: G182
Part of Item: Examples
Comment Type: technical
Summary of Issue: G182: Example 1(1st bullet)
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
1st example reads:

•An article comparing the use of similar elements in different markup languages uses colored text to identify the elements from each language. Elements from the first markup language are identified using BLUE, bolded text. Elements from the second are presented as RED, italicized text. 

This is not a good example as screen reader users can't understand the difference between BLUE/bold and RED/italic.

Proposed Change:
Need additional description like;

"Colored text also should include name of each markup language in text so that screen reader users can identify each markup language."
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2009 08:17:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:14:52 UTC