- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:29:03 -0800
- To: Tim <dogstar27@optushome.com.au>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Your argument is the reason this success criterion is at Level AAA. We know this is not applicable to all sites, and we state that some AAA success criteria cannot be implemented for all sites. Nevertheless, it's an important principle for many users. Regards, Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group On Nov 4, 2007 6:25 AM, Tim <dogstar27@optushome.com.au> wrote: > > 3.1.5 Reading Level: When text requires reading ability more advanced > than the lower secondary education level > > WCAG Guide 2.0 still does not allow for content for a specific > audience, especially University level. > Every university level page in the world will fail testing! > Not every page is intended for a lower secondary school audience > This is dumbing down the web, promoting language keywords that search > engines like. > Tell Shakespeare he uses too many unusual words. > Re-write it for lower secondary level Willimam! > > Yours Faithfully > Tim Anderson > The Editor > Heretic Press > http ://www.hereticpress.com > Email dogstar27@optushome.com > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 23:29:24 UTC