- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:50:07 +0000
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20060427/ Comment 10 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-wcag2-techniques/ Editorial/substantive: S Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: H57, Tests Comment: Step 3 should say 'conforms to RFC 3066 or its successor', since RFC 3066 is now, already out of date, and RFC 3066bis should be used. Note that hopefully it will be possible to point to its successor very soon - we are awaiting the assignment of an RFC number.
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 17:50:14 UTC