- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:36:46 +0000 (UTC)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Christophe Strobbe Email: christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be Affiliation: DocArch - K.U.Leuven Document: W2 Item Number: conformance Part of Item: Comment Type: question Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): Please define or point to criteria for \"high inter-rater reliability\". This is important for developing evaluation procedures based on WCAG 2.0 (especially evaluation procedures that can be repeated with the same results for the same content, although, after reading http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/reltypes.htm and http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/reliab.htm, inter-rater reliability is not the same thing as test-retest reliability). There was an action item for research on inter-rater reliability (http://www.w3.org/2005/04/27-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item02) but I don\'t know what came out of it. Proposed Change:
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2006 13:36:50 UTC