W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > June 2006

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:59:38 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060620215938.E687D47BA1@mojo.w3.org>

Name: Alex Li
Email: alex.li@sap.com
Affiliation: SAP
Document: W2
Item Number: accessible-alternatives-level1
Part of Item: 
Comment Type: general comment
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
Requiring alternative version from the same URI would not be logical if the content in question is part of the process.  In other words, you normally would not switch to alternative version or text-only version in the middle of a check-out process.  You normally do it at the beginning of the process that lead to throught the original or alternative version.

Proposed Change:
Add \"except if the content is part of a process and that alternative version selection can be made by the user at the beginning of the process.\" to 4.2.1.  Yes, I know this is longwinded.  It is not a live or die problem.  But it would make logical sense.
Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2006 21:59:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:06 UTC