- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:27:43 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Sailesh Panchang Email: sailesh.panchang@deque.com Affiliation: Deque Systems Inc Document: W2 Item Number: Provide synchronized alternatives for multimedia Part of Item: Comment Type: QU Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): Although the term \'synchronized\' is used in the guideline 1.2, it is not used to describe any of the requirements in the various SC. Why not? If it is a matter of detail or technique, then why has \'extended\' audio descriptions been explicitly specified against 1.2.6? (By the way I suggested do away with 1.2.6 in an earlier issue I raised.) Proposed Change: I think synchronized is a key word and needs to be included in the SC too.
Received on Friday, 16 June 2006 18:27:54 UTC