W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > June 2006

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 18:36:40 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060602183640.1CCDE47BA5@mojo.w3.org>

Name: Chris Ridpath
Email: chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca
Affiliation: ATRC University of Toronto
Document: TD
Item Number: G63: Providing a Site Map...
Part of Item: Description
Comment Type: TE
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
Good technique but which sites require a sitemap? Should sitemap really contain *all* links? Contain hierarchy, structure? Alphabetic, category? Same as site\'s organization?

Proposed Change:
Describe when to use sitemap instead of other organizational structures. Provide other examples of good sitemaps and describe characteristics of bad sitemaps.
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 18:36:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:06 UTC