- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 18:36:40 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Chris Ridpath Email: chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca Affiliation: ATRC University of Toronto Document: TD Item Number: G63: Providing a Site Map... Part of Item: Description Comment Type: TE Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): Good technique but which sites require a sitemap? Should sitemap really contain *all* links? Contain hierarchy, structure? Alphabetic, category? Same as site\'s organization? Proposed Change: Describe when to use sitemap instead of other organizational structures. Provide other examples of good sitemaps and describe characteristics of bad sitemaps.
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 18:36:44 UTC