W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > November 2005

Feedback on "Understanding WCAG 2.0"

From: David L. Howard <david_howard@ncsu.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:12:32 -0500
Message-ID: <438DB350.5070000@ncsu.edu>
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org

Guys and gals,
   I think that the intent of this document is excellent! I really 
appreciate the time and effort that went into this. I have one specific 

Under the heading 'Techniques for Addressing Success Criterion 1.1.1,' 
it is suggested that there be references to the long description in the 
short description. This makes a ton of sense and I think is a good idea. 
However, in 'Examples of Success Criterion 1.1.1' none of the short 
descriptions have references to the long descriptions. I think that the 
examples are powerful and should be in line with the suggested techniques.

David L. Howard                        david_howard@ncsu.edu
Learning Technology Service            919-513-7020
North Carolina State University
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2005 14:38:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:05 UTC