- From: Web Usability <rhudson@usability.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:53:36 +1100
- To: "Public-Comments-Wcag20" <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>
H1 Working Group Many thanks for all your work. Some comments relating to the Success Criterion concerned with the use of colour follow: Comments on colour differentiation I have worked with a number of people with impaired colour vision who encounter significant difficulties differentiating between the colours that are sometimes used on websites. I have also noticed that as people get older their ability to perceive colours and differentiate between colours seems to diminish. In WCAG 1.0, Checkpoint 2.1 is a Priority 1 requirement for all information that is conveyed with colour to also be available without colour. However in my opinion the needs of people who have problems differentiating between certain colours is not adequately met by Checkpoint 2.1, which is a peculiar mix of Priority 2 and Priority 3 checkpoints. WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion 1.3.2 appears to be a part replacement for the old Checkpoint 2.1 and is a Level 1 criterion. However, there is also a Level 2 Criterion that deals with the communication of information via colour. WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion 1.3.4 (Level 2) states: “1.3.4 Any information that is conveyed by color is visually evident when color is not available.” The “Understanding WCAG 2.0 (Working Draft 23 November 2005)” document, provides the following advice in relation to intention of this criterion: “The intent of this success criterion is to ensure that all users can access information that is conveyed by color. This success criterion is similar to 1.3.2. However where 1.3.2 allows color information to be made accessible directly OR via assistive technology — this success criterion (1.3.4) is focused on people with color anomalies who do not use assistive technologies. Hence this success criterion is focused on seeing that information conveyed via color is available without color and without requiring the person to use any assistive technologies.” I am unclear as to why a distinction is being made between people who are unable to perceive colour and use an assistive technology and those who are unable to perceive colour but don’t use an assistive technology. Surely the point is, that if someone cannot access information because of their inability to perceive colour then that information is effectively inaccessible to them and an alternative should be provided. In my opinion Success Criterion 1.3.4 should either be a stand-alone Level 1 Criterion, or incorporated into Success Criterion 1.3.2. The issue of ensuring there is enough contrast between text (foreground) and its background appear to be addressed in the following Success Criterion for WCAG 2.0 Guideline 1.4: “1.4.1 Text or diagrams, and their background, must have a luminosity contrast ratio of at least 5:1. (Level 2) 1.4.3 Text or diagrams, and their background, must have a luminosity contrast ratio of at least 10:1. (Level 3)” The spread of this requirement over two Success Criterion Levels appears to be an effective way of recognising the fact that the higher the contrast ratio the more likely the information will be accessible to a greater number of people with impaired colour vision. However in my opinion, greater importance should to be given to the needs of people who have difficulty distinguishing foreground text from its background. I would urge the working group to consider changing the success Levels for these criteria. That is the Success Criterion for 1.4.1 should be Level 1, and for 1.4.3 it should be Level 2. Once again, thanks and best wishes for the new year. Regards Roger Hudson
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2005 05:54:10 UTC