- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:17:08 +0100
- To: "WCAG 2 comments" <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>
There are several problems with the requirements for this. The key problem is that it apparently allows an alternative version which meets level 1 requirements to be used to satisfy level 3 conformance, which is a logical failure in the conformance scheme. Either something like ATAG's relative priority should be used, to ensure that conformance can only be claimed to the level met by the alternative content, or there should be success criteria at each level that do the same thing. Also, as it is explained in "Understanding WCAG": 1. The requirement for a link should specify that at least the link to the content must meet WCAG conformance at the desired level. 2. The note about user agents that don't support content negotiation is redundant, since in that case the technique suggested doesn't apply. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:17:44 UTC