- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:36:29 +0100
- To: public-colloquial-contrib@w3.org
On 16 September 2011 14:02, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote: >> I'm wondering how a dom inspector achieves any sort of validation Noah? > > Well, the DOM inspector is part-and-parcel with a JavaScript console, and other tools. So I get warnings about parse errors, or security issues and such like. Now there's a novel (and v.valuable) addition to a definition of 'valid'? > But other than that, I don't suppose it does. I guess what I'm saying is that I don't care about validation in the traditional sense. The way I "validate" my work is to load it up in a browser and poke at it to see if it looks and functions as I expect it to. With todays woolly definition of a web page, "Does it look and function as I expect it to" is equally valid as a part of validity? http://www.w3.org/community/colloquial/wiki/Glossary regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Friday, 16 September 2011 13:37:01 UTC