- From: Julie Rawe <jrawe@understood.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:30:45 -0500
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKuGZ+jvj6hSg6juz1PzaV4p42V6MEuF8f6v+j964Nqv-TXsMA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, folks, thanks for your time today. Below are the highlights and minutes
from today's subgroup meeting.
*Highlights*
- *COGA tracking doc for WCAG 3 pathways*
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VhXbUz8PZpRTMvHJq5ZXPwPNXwFNFQDyBi9SWbL6awk/edit?gid=0#gid=0>
- Anyone in COGA can add to this tracking doc at any time.
- Use this doc to raise concerns or share updates about WCAG 3
subgroups.
- Please bookmark. (Julie also added link to this tracking doc in the
WCAG 3 section of COGA action items
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/15HtPkkYx1CIl6bAwP2nsSZKhqTVbqcuMDRz5RmtmvXg/edit?tab=t.0>
.)
- *Trigger warnings*
- *Action item:* Rashmi will email COGA's draft issue paper
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/19RdKrd2aUJkZcm9FmIOvZ2jfn9JgYpFcqT5mubyQUAQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.p1q1f5jvv2f>
to the WCAG 3 group that is working on trigger warnings. (Julie
and Rashmi
discussed this at the Github editors call earlier today.)
- *Appropriate tone *
- This draft requirement
<https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0/#appropriate-tone> started out
in the Prevent
Harm scratchpad
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S9K4i0CAiTHCWXD0_LnpS90E2l9VC_Xs18UmOXhGzaw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.t3uqwwnk7ffi>,
but the AG chairs moved it to Plain Language.
- Julie is wondering if Plain Language is the best place for it.
- Frankie and John K. provided insights on the origin of this
requirement, which includes protecting against false urgency and other
forms of deception.
- *Action items: *
- Julie will ask Gregg Vanderheiden for more insights about
"Appropriate tone."
- Julie will talk with Plain Language group about developing an
assertion about having a style guide that covers tone.
- Julie will talk with the other WCAG 3 subgroup leaders about
possibly moving "Appropriate Tone" requirement to Safety and Deception.
- *Global concern about all WCAG 3 paths*
- Subgroup discussed low participation in different paths (very small
number of people doing the drafting) and very ambitious timeline
to get all
the drafts in.
- Subgroup discussed concerns about needing time for COGA to review
the drafts, which will be very hard given all the simultaneous
workstreams
of drafting more WCAG 3 guidelines while also working on next version of
Making Content Usable.
- Frankie suggested that AG build in time for a review sprint where
different paths review each other's work.
- *Action item: *Julie will raise this concern and the idea of review
sprints with Rachael.
*Minutes*
- Apologies, but Zakim wasn't working properly so I had to copy and
paste everything in IRC in order to generate minutes. I wish Zakim wasn't
so hard to use.
- https://www.w3.org/2025/02/13-coga-minutes.html
*Next WCAG 3 Coordination Subgroup Meeting*
- Thursday, April 3rd, at 11am ET
--
[image: understood.logo] <https://www.understood.org/> *Julie Rawe*
*Director, Content Strategy & Accessibility*
jrawe@understood.org
www.understood.org
she | her | hers
[image: facebook icon] <https://www.facebook.com/Understood/> [image:
linkedin icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/understood/> [image:
instagram icon] <https://www.instagram.com/understoodorg/?hl=en> [image:
tiktok icon] <https://www.tiktok.com/@understood.org> *Support us
<https://www.understood.org/donate>*
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2025 17:31:01 UTC