- From: Julie Rawe <jrawe@understood.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:30:45 -0500
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKuGZ+jvj6hSg6juz1PzaV4p42V6MEuF8f6v+j964Nqv-TXsMA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, folks, thanks for your time today. Below are the highlights and minutes from today's subgroup meeting. *Highlights* - *COGA tracking doc for WCAG 3 pathways* <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VhXbUz8PZpRTMvHJq5ZXPwPNXwFNFQDyBi9SWbL6awk/edit?gid=0#gid=0> - Anyone in COGA can add to this tracking doc at any time. - Use this doc to raise concerns or share updates about WCAG 3 subgroups. - Please bookmark. (Julie also added link to this tracking doc in the WCAG 3 section of COGA action items <https://docs.google.com/document/d/15HtPkkYx1CIl6bAwP2nsSZKhqTVbqcuMDRz5RmtmvXg/edit?tab=t.0> .) - *Trigger warnings* - *Action item:* Rashmi will email COGA's draft issue paper <https://docs.google.com/document/d/19RdKrd2aUJkZcm9FmIOvZ2jfn9JgYpFcqT5mubyQUAQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.p1q1f5jvv2f> to the WCAG 3 group that is working on trigger warnings. (Julie and Rashmi discussed this at the Github editors call earlier today.) - *Appropriate tone * - This draft requirement <https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0/#appropriate-tone> started out in the Prevent Harm scratchpad <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S9K4i0CAiTHCWXD0_LnpS90E2l9VC_Xs18UmOXhGzaw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.t3uqwwnk7ffi>, but the AG chairs moved it to Plain Language. - Julie is wondering if Plain Language is the best place for it. - Frankie and John K. provided insights on the origin of this requirement, which includes protecting against false urgency and other forms of deception. - *Action items: * - Julie will ask Gregg Vanderheiden for more insights about "Appropriate tone." - Julie will talk with Plain Language group about developing an assertion about having a style guide that covers tone. - Julie will talk with the other WCAG 3 subgroup leaders about possibly moving "Appropriate Tone" requirement to Safety and Deception. - *Global concern about all WCAG 3 paths* - Subgroup discussed low participation in different paths (very small number of people doing the drafting) and very ambitious timeline to get all the drafts in. - Subgroup discussed concerns about needing time for COGA to review the drafts, which will be very hard given all the simultaneous workstreams of drafting more WCAG 3 guidelines while also working on next version of Making Content Usable. - Frankie suggested that AG build in time for a review sprint where different paths review each other's work. - *Action item: *Julie will raise this concern and the idea of review sprints with Rachael. *Minutes* - Apologies, but Zakim wasn't working properly so I had to copy and paste everything in IRC in order to generate minutes. I wish Zakim wasn't so hard to use. - https://www.w3.org/2025/02/13-coga-minutes.html *Next WCAG 3 Coordination Subgroup Meeting* - Thursday, April 3rd, at 11am ET -- [image: understood.logo] <https://www.understood.org/> *Julie Rawe* *Director, Content Strategy & Accessibility* jrawe@understood.org www.understood.org she | her | hers [image: facebook icon] <https://www.facebook.com/Understood/> [image: linkedin icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/understood/> [image: instagram icon] <https://www.instagram.com/understoodorg/?hl=en> [image: tiktok icon] <https://www.tiktok.com/@understood.org> *Support us <https://www.understood.org/donate>*
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2025 17:31:01 UTC