- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 14:12:45 +0200
- To: David Swallow <dswallow@tpgi.com>
- Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKExBM+KrXktzrxAGAcSAXjH0BWcZcDnSQPwBY7+G32oZsYEgA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks David Can you send out the meeting page as well ? All the best Lisa On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:25 PM David Swallow <dswallow@tpgi.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Just following up on the joint COGA-RQTF meeting to discuss CTAUR issues. > > RQTF have now confirmed that the meeting will be on *Wednesday 27th March > *at *9:00am until 10:00am Boston time.* > > Here is the Editor's Draft of CTAUR, where all the changes in response to > COGA feedback have been made: https://w3c.github.io/ctaur/ > > Many thanks, > > David Swallow > Principal UX Consultant > > > TPG Interactive > https://www.tpgi.com > > > A Vispero Company > https://www.vispero.com > > > [image: Join us at CSUN 2024, Vispero Booth #503, March 18 -22; Anaheim, > CA. Make every interaction inclusive and Usable. Check out our > accessibility talks.] > <https://www.tpgi.com/csun-2024-at-conference-tpgi-sessions/> > > -- > > This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended > recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us > immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or > omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message > is prohibited and may be unlawful. > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* David Swallow <dswallow@tpgi.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 28, 2024 2:20 PM > *To:* Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> > *Cc:* public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: COGA’s feedback on Collaboration Tools Accessibility User > Requirements > > CAUTION:EXTERNAL EMAIL SENDER! > > Hi all, > > Just following up on the joint COGA-RQTF meeting to discuss CTAUR issues. > > Essentially, they are happy to meet during the regular RQTF meeting > timeslot, which is Wednesdays at 9:00 until 10:00 Boston time. > > They wondered whether 6th March would be too soon for COGA to convene? If > that's the case, there's also the 13th and 20th March. But they'd rather > not go any later than that. > > (Just as a note, I am going to struggle to make the 20th as I will be at > CSUN in Anaheim that week.) > > Does anyone plan to be on the call, and if so, what date would you prefer? > > Many thanks, > > David Swallow > Principal UX Consultant > > > TPG Interactive > https://www.tpgi.com > > > A Vispero Company > https://www.vispero.com > > > [image: Join us at CSUN 2024, Vispero Booth #503, March 18 -22; Anaheim, > CA. Make every interaction inclusive and Usable. Check out our > accessibility talks.] > <https://www.tpgi.com/csun-2024-at-conference-tpgi-sessions/> > > -- > > This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended > recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us > immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or > omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message > is prohibited and may be unlawful. > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* David Swallow <dswallow@tpgi.com> > *Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2024 6:20 PM > *To:* Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> > *Cc:* public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: COGA’s feedback on Collaboration Tools Accessibility User > Requirements > > CAUTION:EXTERNAL EMAIL SENDER! > > Hi Lisa, > > Yes, will do. I think RQTF suggested a meeting could be at the start of > March, but I'll confirm on this week's call. > > Cheers, > > David > > > *From:* Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2024 5:31 PM > *To:* David Swallow <dswallow@tpgi.com> > *Cc:* public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: COGA’s feedback on Collaboration Tools Accessibility User > Requirements > > CAUTION:EXTERNAL EMAIL SENDER! > > Hi David > > Can you coordinate a week were we can go to the RTQF meeting and go though > them? > > All the best > Lisa > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 6:15 PM David Swallow <dswallow@tpgi.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Over the last few months, I have been communicating COGA’s feedback on > Collaboration Tools Accessibility User Requirements (CTAUR) to the Research > Questions Task Force (RQTF) who created the document. > > Although RQTF welcomed all feedback, and there has been a lot of > discussion, they pushed back on quite a few issues due to them being out of > scope. This is typically where: > > - COGA’s feedback doesn’t pertain specifically to collaborative tools, > but rather to software in general. > - RQTF felt a particular issue was already covered in CTAUR. > - RQTF felt a particular issue was about a very specific environment > and not generalizable enough. > - An issue was explained from the perspective of a person with > cognitive disabilities, but the document doesn’t explain it from the > perspective of any other user group, so it would seem odd to mention them > specifically. > > > Due to the number of issues rejected, it was felt that a meeting between > COGA and RQTF would be useful, as this would allow members of COGA who feel > strongly about a particular issue to make their case. > > Unfortunately, because of how COGA gathered feedback in a Google Doc, some > of the comments have become disconnected from the person who created them. > So, it’s difficult to know who might want to attend a meeting. We know > John, Jennie, and Lisa gave some of the feedback, but there will be others. > > > I've created a document which attempts to summarize COGA’s feedback on > CTAUR to RQTF as well as RQTF’s response, to allow COGA members to decide > on whether they would like to join the COGA-RQTF meeting. The first few > issues have ‘additional response from COGA’ as we managed to discuss these > issues. > > *Please have a look through the document, particularly at the issues that > RQTF have rejected, and if you see something that you feel needs further > discussion, let us know.* > > > - COGA’s feedback on Collaboration Tools Accessibility User > Requirements: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CFJoA8DHst31mej6o2en49wXhoMMLVe15fUzQB-owk8/edit?usp=sharing > > > > - For reference, COGA’s original feedback on CTAUR can be found here: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CJhBYRI-zk2rl_mohHZ63xAGZxzpDMxhHhXT66bjFBI/edit?usp=sharing > > - The latest version of CTAUR (which may have changed slightly since > COGA provided feedback) can be found here: https://w3c.github.io/ctaur/ > > > Any questions, let me know! > > David Swallow > Principal UX Consultant > > > TPG Interactive > https://www.tpgi.com > > > A Vispero Company > https://www.vispero.com > > > [image: Join us at CSUN 2024, Vispero Booth #503, March 18 -22; Anaheim, > CA. Make every interaction inclusive and Usable. Check out our > accessibility talks.] > <https://www.tpgi.com/csun-2024-at-conference-tpgi-sessions/> > > -- > > This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended > recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us > immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or > omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message > is prohibited and may be unlawful. > > > >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: Outlook-Join_us_at.png
- image/png attachment: 02-Outlook-Join_us_at.png
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2024 12:13:28 UTC