Card sort results

Hello,

In AG today we reviewed the initial card sort results. You can review the slides<https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1kpoEeAfNpZhvYbaPeLNqoar-a3WSFHlsU3zWtOi_51k/edit#slide=id.g2b70ee50303_4_6> or document version<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ry8491DxGAiFLAbtBaTETw8vBOoOlf9GksEg4qYV00I/edit#heading=h.24lxf94dd80m>.

Key takeaways:

  *   Of the different ways that people categorized outcomes, the two primary ways that emerged were by:
     *    Type of content, and
     *   What to provide
  *
Using categorization tools, we created 2 possible lists of high level categories and have presented those lists in the table below. This table compares the possible groupings and the two ways people categorized content.
  *
The next step is likely a closed card sort to better evaluate these options.



Option 1 (Type of Content)

Option 2 (What to Provide)

(Prevent Harm & Deception)

Prevent Harm & Deception

Controls

Provide usable controls

Consistent Interaction /
Navigation & Orientation

Help user orient

Processes and data-entry

Support Processes and Task Completion

Clear Language / Wording and Terminology

Provide Clear Language/Content

Visual and Auditory Alternatives

Provide alternative formats

Structure & Meaning

Organize and structure content

Design, Layout, & Hierarchy

[Included in Structure & Organization]

Input Agnostic

Support Input

Color, Typography & Contrast

Distinguish content through contrast & clear typography

Adaptability & Customization

Support adaptability & customization



Provide help & documentation

If a small group session is needed or if you have follow up questions, please reach out to  group-ag-chairs@w3.org.

Kind regards,

Rachael