- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:29:59 +0300
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKExBMJJRD7Pd0et0P_xvoo3YRwBBQbaEpiF_nJGyPfZWYgENg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Fokes Hi Folks, This is a Call For Consensus (CFC) On this week's call we agreed to move forward with the Editor's draft of our issue papers. You can see the draft <https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/issue-papers-v2/issue-papers/index.html> and check the links to the issue papers I added the editors notes as we agreed on the call. However I made small editorial changes so that it would work with the W3C system. (They did not allow lists in an editor's note.) *Next steps: *My next step would be to start the publication process with Roy and ask APA and AG to approve it, with the understanding that there will be more editorial changes in this draft including moving sentences around so that it reads better or even deleting content that is repeated in two places. *Action: * - If you agree with the next step you can write back "+1" . - If you disagree with this decision you can write back "-1" and say why you object . - You can also write "0" if you do not have a strong opinion either way. You can object until 8 am boston time 22nd August 2024. Not writing back will be seen as agreement Thanks and all the best Lisa -- All the best Lisa Seeman-Horwitz LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2024 11:30:40 UTC