- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 15:30:32 +0300
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2022 12:36:39 UTC
I was looking at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oKFdfFN-98QZX2vaS77ElheXS_ruKhtObUHEsJjKpp4/edit# on double negitives. Our wording in content useable was avoid double negative to express a positive. This came after a lot of thought and back and forth. Do you want to discuss what I remember from the conversation? We found that avoiding double negatives did not work internationally and was very inconsistent even in English. The title of the pattern was shortened to fit in the nav bar, but it is the wording of the pattern and not the title that is important. However the fact that we go confused between the two suggests that we need to be more careful with patten names. Can we add that to the structure conversation? All the best Lisa
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2022 12:36:39 UTC