Re: methodology review for mental health research

Hi Albert
Theses are just the links that we used last time. I can not make them work,
if they are now down. However we can look up other papers on evaluating
reaserch

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:27 PM Dongjun Kim <dongjun@usc.edu> wrote:

> Hello Lisa,
>
> I think that there are two links that don't work from your email on
> methodology review for mental health research.
>
> http://www.ttuhsc.edu/gsbs/srw/JudgingCriteria_ScientificResearch.aspx
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.ttuhsc.edu/gsbs/srw/JudgingCriteria_ScientificResearch.aspx__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!5n_pLEjET__KZRMNyeb8stFFFB_ee3yKs9gxkK6-AFVb1uJhn6cWMWN1CMtUuGU$>
>
> http://blog.reseapro.com/2012/08/criteria-of-good-research/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://blog.reseapro.com/2012/08/criteria-of-good-research/__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!5n_pLEjET__KZRMNyeb8stFFFB_ee3yKs9gxkK6-AFVb1uJhn6cWMWN1kYNBuIo$>
>
> Would you be able to share the working link?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:55 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks
>> As we are moving forward with  mental health, we should review the
>> methodology we used last time, and see if we need changes.
>>
>> As we have Jason on the phone this week, he may be able to give us some
>> input! We also should review this after we have recruited more experts in
>> this topic.
>>
>> When we last thought about methodology we came to the following
>> conclusions.
>>
>>    1. We  had a general methodology on what we are looking for each topic
>>    #methodology-in-user-research
>>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://w3c.github.io/coga/user-research/*methodology-in-user-research__;Iw!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!5n_pLEjET__KZRMNyeb8stFFFB_ee3yKs9gxkK6-AFVb1uJhn6cWMWN1RBZSTz8$>
>>    2. Criteria by which we decide what research to accept: Due to
>>    practical constraints most research will simply be cited and not examined
>>    for credibility. However the following cases will rely on task force
>>    consensuses before inclusion:
>>       1. Commercial research that implies the use of a specific
>>       proprietary product will be examined for scientific credibility before
>>       being included
>>       2. Research where the task force is aware of contradictory
>>       evidence (including anecdotal) will be examined for scientific credibility
>>       before being included.
>>
>> *Also I remember at the time that this included if anyone had doubts on
>> conclusions from their experiences, we would evaluate it critically *
>>
>> Links for evaluating what scientific research is good (or not):
>> http://www.reportbd.com/articles/57/1/Criteria-Qualities-of-Good-Scientific-Research/Page1.html
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.reportbd.com/articles/57/1/Criteria-Qualities-of-Good-Scientific-Research/Page1.html__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!5n_pLEjET__KZRMNyeb8stFFFB_ee3yKs9gxkK6-AFVb1uJhn6cWMWN1ABNTwlE$>
>>
>> http://www.ttuhsc.edu/gsbs/srw/JudgingCriteria_ScientificResearch.aspx
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.ttuhsc.edu/gsbs/srw/JudgingCriteria_ScientificResearch.aspx__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!5n_pLEjET__KZRMNyeb8stFFFB_ee3yKs9gxkK6-AFVb1uJhn6cWMWN1CMtUuGU$>
>>
>> http://www.slideshare.net/Sisyphosstone/81-criteria-ofscientificresearch
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.slideshare.net/Sisyphosstone/81-criteria-ofscientificresearch__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!5n_pLEjET__KZRMNyeb8stFFFB_ee3yKs9gxkK6-AFVb1uJhn6cWMWN1K4vhZfg$>
>>
>> http://blog.reseapro.com/2012/08/criteria-of-good-research/
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://blog.reseapro.com/2012/08/criteria-of-good-research/__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!5n_pLEjET__KZRMNyeb8stFFFB_ee3yKs9gxkK6-AFVb1uJhn6cWMWN1kYNBuIo$>
>> See COGA_Resolutions
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/COGA_Resolutions__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!5n_pLEjET__KZRMNyeb8stFFFB_ee3yKs9gxkK6-AFVb1uJhn6cWMWN1cALgvlg$>
>>
>>
>>
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://w3c.github.io/coga/user-research/*methodology-in-user-research__;Iw!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!5n_pLEjET__KZRMNyeb8stFFFB_ee3yKs9gxkK6-AFVb1uJhn6cWMWN1RBZSTz8$>
>>
>
>
> --
> Albert Kim | Pronouns: he/him | Twitter <https://twitter.com/djkalbert> |
> Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/albertdkim/>
>