Re: Issue 195 - please respond by 3/23

Hi Justine

SOme comment - in no particular order

 intellection disabilities is now mentioned in the abstract. See
https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/consistency_checks/content-usable/index.html#abstract
Age Related Memory Loss is in the glossary

with metioning that it helps everyone: we say : While this guidance may
improve usability for all, these patterns are essential for some people
with cognitive and learning impairments to be able to use content
independently.

Mention common conditions to help describe what you mean by "cognitive and
learning disabilities": - this is now in the abstract


Mention common conditions to help describe what you mean by "cognitive and
learning disabilities":


Use more formatting to help chunk information:: add that we will also make
an oline version were we will be able to chuck the information better.

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 6:19 PM Pascalides, Justine E <JPascalides@ets.org>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> COGA received detailed feedback on several areas of Content Usable in issue
> 195 <https://github.com/w3c/coga/issues/195>. The editorial team
> discussed the suggestions and propose the following response. Please reply
> with any comments by 3/23.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you for your detailed feedback. The task force has reviewed your
> suggestions and have determined a path forward for each of the sub-issues
> that were submitted, as follows.
>
>
>
> 1. Use more formatting to help chunk information: Thank you for this
> suggestion. The task force conducted a thorough review of the document and
> organized in the most effective manner consistent with W3C style.
>
>
>
> 2. Clarify 2nd paragraph in the introduction: Regarding your question
> about the statement "Some accessibility features will help people with
> cognitive impairments", the same statement does apply to individuals with
> learning disabilities. The task force determined that consistent use of
> terminology throughout the document was an appropriate path forward.
>
>
>
> Regarding your question about the phrase "other factors that are difficult
> to include in general guidelines" this relates to personalization which is
> actively being addressed by the W3C's personalization task force. This text
> was agreed upon through consensus in the Accessibility Guidelines Working
> Group. Unfortunately, we need to publish version 1.0 in early 2021 and we
> are not able to adjust consensus text at this time.
>
>
>
> 3. COGA guidelines can be helpful to all web users: Similar to above, the
> current language is consensus text that was approved by the Accessibility
> Guidelines Working Group that we are not able to edit at this time. Your
> feedback is appreciated and will be considered for the next version of
> Content Usable.
>
>
>
> 4. Define usability: Thank you for your comment. Unfortunately, we need to
> publish version 1.0 in early 2021, but we will look into the issue for the
> next version of the document.
>
>
>
> 5. Mention common conditions to help describe what you mean by "cognitive
> and learning disabilities": We feel that this consideration is addressed
> elsewhere in the document and in order to keep the length of the document
> to a minimum, we would prefer not to make the change at this time.
>
>
>
> 6. Mention intellection disabilities in the introduction and mention that
> learning disabilities can mean different things in different parts of the
> world: Thank you for this suggestion. The task force determined that
> consistent use of terminology throughout the document was essential and we
> would prefer to avoid making the change at this time.
>
>
>
> 7. Consider restructuring the list of 8 examples in 2.2: We truly
> appreciate your detailed feedback. Unfortunately, we need to publish
> version 1.0 in early 2021 and we are not able to adjust consensus text at
> this time.
>
>
>
> 8. Clarify what is meant by "may be age related": We feel that this
> consideration is addressed elsewhere in the document and in order to keep
> the length of the document to a minimum, we would prefer not to make the
> change at this time.
>
>
>
>
>
> Justine Pascalides
>
> Technology, Accessibility, and Innovation
>
> ETS | Assessment and Learning Technology Development
>
> Ph: 609-683-2213 | Email: jpascalides@ets.org
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>