Re: edited draft for 143 - Motor automaticity and object permanence

+1

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:34 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks
>
>
> I was asked to write an received response to 143
> <https://github.com/w3c/coga/issues/143> on Motor automaticity and object
> permanence
>
>  Send a  +1 if you agree - if not please add comments .
>
>
>
> Proposal:
>
> Thank you for your comments. We intend to add clarifications, based on
> your comments, to pattern 4.2.3  pattern 4.3.4 and Persona: Amy Scenario 1.
>
>  In addition you will find other places that we have address these issues:
>
>
> Object permanence
>
> Challenges with object permanence (not the particular phrase), are covered
> in:
>
> ·        3.2.1 User Story: Findable includes the user need - "I can reach
> important information and the controls I need without scrolling or carrying
> out other actions. They are not hidden or off screen."
>
> ·        4.2.6 Pattern: Make the Relationship Clear Between Controls and
> What They Affect - "Avoiding multiple or nested scrolling areas"
>
> ·        4.3.1 Pattern: Make it Easy to Identify the Most Important Tasks
> and Features of the Site - "Placing the tasks/features towards the top of
> the page so the user does not have to scroll to see them,
>
> Placing the tasks/features toward the top of the content so assistive
> technology finds them quickly"
>
> ·        4.3.4 Pattern: Ensure the Most Important Things on the Page are
> Easy to Find - "Make key content visually stand out and be visible to users
> without needing to scroll the page or hover over content."
>
>
>
> Motor automaticity
>
> Challenges around motor automaticity (not the particular phrase), are
> covered in:
>
> ·        3.7.4 User Story: Cognitive Stress - "I need simple, consistent
> content."
>
> ·        3.8.1 User Story: Adapt - "I need the controls to be
> consistently positioned on the screen where I expect them to be."
>
> ·        4.2.3 Pattern: Use a Consistent Visual Design - "Use a
> consistent visual design across groups of pages." and "Layout is consistent
> across blocks of content, including position of interactive elements and
> navigational controls."
>
>
>
>
> Adding the terms into the document, the glossary, and Use Cases/Personas
> is bigger than we can handle in the time we have available for publishing
> version 1.  We would like to address these issues more in the next version
> (1.1) of our document, when we will have more time.  We intend to consider
> for version 1.1:
>
> ·        Adding the terms  motor automaticity  and object permanence into
> the document to make it easier for those looking for the term to find the
> appropriate user stories and patterns
>
> ·        Adding the terms into the glossary if the term becomes added
> into the document
>
> ·        Adding the terms into a Use Case/Persona
>
>
> Thanks again for your review and help
>
>
> The task force
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Rachael Montgomery, PhD
Director, Accessible Community
rachael@accessiblecommunity.org

"I will paint this day with laughter;
I will frame this night in song."
 - Og Mandino