- From: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 09:02:53 +0000
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org
+1 It might be an idea to explain the expectations and process of a formal Wide Review in simple terms. Well, as simple as the W3C process can be made! heh. I'm happy to attempt it if there's demand. Steve On 12/03/2020 15:52, lisa.seeman wrote: > Hi Folks > > On today's call we discussed that we want to formally publishing our > guidance as a note (making content usable) in time for WCAG 2.2. That > will enable us to do the publicity together for content-useable and > WCAG 2.2. > > We can make a second version for any additional content. > > The cost will be that we will have to be ruthless about adding new > content and cut things out because we wont have time to do it. We will > publish an item draft in about a month and no new patterns will be added > after that. A wide review draft will have a lot of the cross referencing > etc. If we approve this proposal then I will write a priorities list for > us to discuss. > > Let us know if you agree. Silence will be understood as agreement. > > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > >
Received on Friday, 13 March 2020 09:02:55 UTC