Fwd: Add "Error correction (Processes)" to WCAG 2.2 draft

Hello,

The CFC for Error Correction (Processes) didn't pass.  The chairs discussed
this today and Alastair is moving forward with one last attempt to work
through the issues.

We can discuss this on Thursday as an additional agenda item but I wanted
to call your attention to this conversation on the AG list in case you want
to respond.

Best regards,

Rachael

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: Add "Error correction (Processes)" to WCAG 2.2 draft
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Jonathan Avila <
jon.avila@levelaccess.com>, Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>


Hi Everyone,



The CFC did not pass, apologies for the delay in finalising this one.



I think it is worth one final shot if a small adjustment helps.



Of the issues raised:

   - Gundula raised an issue, but off-list confirmed she could live with
   it.

   - Justine raised an issue which I think can be tackled in the
   understanding document.
   NB: Adding ‘essential’ to the end of the 1st bullet doesn’t work with
   the definition.

   - Jon & Sailesh raised issues around how it fits with 3.3.4 & 3.3.6



On the last point, what if we adjusted the levels so that we had:



3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data) – Level A, moving from AA.

3.3.X Error Correction (Processes) – Level AA

3.3.6 Error Prevention (All) – Level AAA



This doc shows the three SCs together:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PItvc45Neukviw3KZOS0dpOi3L4Xj5ZBMYxLT3vaLSY/edit#



The gap COGA were most interesting in filling was to enable correction
before you finalise a process. That is not covered (properly) by 3.3.4. In
WCAG 2.1 the aim was to update 3.3.4, but that didn’t work out.



Would that adjustment to the levels make sense?



Kind regards,



-Alastair





*From:* Alastair Campbell



Call For Consensus — ends Wednesday July 15th at midday Boston time.



The Working Group has discussed adding the new SC “Error correction
(Processes)” to the WCAG 2.2 draft:

https://www.w3.org/2020/03/25-ag-minutes.html#item03



The changes, preview of the documents, and survey link are detailed in this
pull request:

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1157



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
the CfC deadline.



Kind regards,



-Alastair



-- 



www.nomensa.com / @alastc




-- 
Rachael Montgomery, PhD
Director, Accessible Community
rachael@accessiblecommunity.org

"I will paint this day with laughter;
I will frame this night in song."
 - Og Mandino