Re: Accessible Authentication doc review for 1/14 AGWG call

Hi John,

I’d leave the comments on the SC for discussion on the call, but if there are improvements to the understanding doc areas that you agree with please do merge them in.

I think the main issue Jake pointed out is whether doing an email-reset is a method of passing.

We have been saying that should be a method, but it also appears to fail the SC text as you (typically) have to transcribe / remember the password during that process.

If anyone has any ideas on that, they would be welcome!

Cheers,

-Alastair

From: "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>
Date: Sunday, 12 January 2020 at 20:26
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: "lisa.seeman@zoho.com" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, Rachael Bradley Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>, Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>, COGA TF <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: Accessible Authentication doc review for 1/14 AGWG call

Hi Alastair,

The Accessible Authentication SC<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4pYxq9vxj2E1GfeH6RGWvqvtCyGfLGDVFopNf8B_U/edit> doc now has a lot of new comments from Jake Abama and a couple from Bruce Bailey. Should I address them prior to the 1/14 AGWG call, or during it?

John

John Rochford
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Faculty, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org
About Me<https://johnrochford.com/?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=edit_panel&utm_content=plaintext>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.