W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > January 2020

WCAG 2.2 status update

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 17:31:06 +0000
To: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
CC: COGA TF <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, LVTF - low-vision-a11y <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FFA21757-AAC9-4ECB-AE02-B3F55FF49B90@nomensa.com>
Hi everyone,

Welcome back after the holidays, happy new decade!

I thought I would start with a quick update on the status of the various WCAG 2.2 SCs.

I’ve included all the new SCs below, and tried to highlight which need a re-evaluation. They are in order of when they will appear in the agendas<https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Upcoming_agendas>, so please do start at the top!

For anyone shepherding an SC, please do look at the agendas<https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Upcoming_agendas> page and let me know if you won’t be around when your one(s) comes up.

Timeline

Time is now getting short, so our short-term aim is roughly:


  *   January: Approve (or not) in principle each SC text & understanding doc. We’ll be rattling through them quickly, so if you have a time to work through the surveys ahead of this week, please do!

  *   February: For those that make it through January, we then have Feb to work on at least one technique for each.

  *   March: Refinement and approvals, the working draft will then go for a wide review in early April.


SCs for review


  *   Dragging: Up for 1st review Jan 7th:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-dragging/

  *   Visual indicators: Last reviewed 17th Dec: https://www.w3.org/2019/12/17-ag-minutes.html#item03

Need to have David (author) present. Up for this Tuesday (7th), overall we weren’t sure about the scope & overlap with user-agent side.
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Visual_indicators/

  *   Icon Description: Has been updated after previous reviews, up for the 7th Jan meeting:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/icon-desc-acceptance/

  *   Accessible authentication: Overhauled to focus on the cognitive aspects after Dec 10th, all previous comments are essentially out of date, please re-evaluate:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/accessible-auth/

It needs someone to write a simple technique. (NOT implementation or working example, just a short ‘how to’ explanation.)
  *   Important controls: Overhauled by Rachael, Bruce & MichaelG, it now focuses on the visual aspect and uses a new definition of ‘prominent’. All previous answers are now out of date, please re-evaluate:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/essential-controls/

It needs someone to write a simple technique.
  *   Touch target spacing: Updated by Kathy & Mobile task force to enforce a minimum size+spacing. Need to establish if the approach has support and then work on understanding/technique docs, please re-evaluate:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/target-spacing/

  *   Information in steps: Reviewed on Dec 3rd: https://www.w3.org/2019/12/03-ag-minutes.html#item01

Needs an update (with DavidF) to ensure the comments are addressed, and down to one version for review.
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/info-in-steps/

  *   Fixed Reference Points: Reviewed Dec 3rd: https://www.w3.org/2019/12/03-ag-minutes.html#item02

Has since been updated to use “explicit navigation markers”, please re-evaluate:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/page-break-nav/

  *   Find help: Reviewed Dec 10th: https://www.w3.org/2019/12/10-ag-minutes.html#item04

Has since been updated, please re-evaluate:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/findable-help/

  *   Confirmation before submission: Reviewed Dec 10th: https://www.w3.org/2019/12/10-ag-minutes.html#item03

I think it needs some updates before another review (SteveL). Previous results:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-confirm-before-submission/results

  *   Custom interactions, reviewed Dec 17th: https://www.w3.org/2019/12/17-ag-minutes.html#item04

Some big questions left open about whether the interaction is the problem, or the expectation of the interaction. Would really like people to collect examples of a non-standard interactions (anyone, not just Jake!)
Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Custom_interactions/

  *   Focus visible (enhanced): CFC approved, will be included in the working draft soon. Post-approval comments in github.
  *   Visible labels & Orientation: were thought to be possible to cover with understanding/technique updates.
Kind regards,

-Alastair
--
www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/> / @alastc
Received on Friday, 3 January 2020 17:31:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:04 UTC