Re: Draft Silver Response

Hello,

Please see the revision below that incorporates comments up until today.
Please write back by Monday, September 9th if you have additional changes.

Thank you,

Rachael

***DRAFT BEGINS HERE***

To: Silver Taskforce
From: COGA Taskforce
Re: Silver Conformance Models

Hello,

Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed
conformance models. We recognize they are in an early phase at this point
and hope that we can continue to talk with you as they progress. Our
comments at this time are as follows:

   - A very complex scoring system may make it difficult for people with
   cognitive disabilities to use.  These drafts are so complex right now that
   it is difficult to review and provide feedback. Whatever solution is
   suggested, it needs to include plain text alternatives to the formulas and
   complexity to allow for inclusive review and comment.
   - Usability testing with individuals with disabilities is a key need to
   support COGA but there are risks such as difficulty in gaining legislative
   adoption and the possibility teams will intentionally create less usable
   systems to ensure "good" usability test results. In addition, lack of
   funding available in many government programs and small organizations may
   make usability testing difficult. Any model should work to reduce these
   risks while still including usability as an important component.
   - There is a risk for COGA  in weighting issues by severity as small
   issues can lead to fatigue but individually would not be "severe."  There
   is also a risk in measuring by groups as COGA represents a very diverse set
   of users with overlapping but sometimes distinct user needs. If, for
   example, visual disabilities are broken out into subgroups such as blind,
   low vision, and color blind then COGA should also be broken out into
   distinct such groups such as Dyslexia, Aphasia, Non-verbal - Severe Speech
   and Language impairments, Aging and Dementia, Intellectual
   Disability, Autism, Dyscalculia, Anxiety, and Depression.
   - We also believe that any conformance model should begin with and map
   to user needs.

Thank you again,

Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:12 PM Rachael Bradley Montgomery <
rachael@accessiblecommunity.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Based the discussions we had, I've drafted a strawman response to send to
> Silver.  I tried to draw from the minutes and emails I've seen but I've
> likely missed or misstated something. I would appreciate your feedback. We
> will disucss this briefly at tomorrow's meeting but please send edits to
> the group.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Rachael
>
> ***DRAFT BEGINS HERE***
>
> To: Silver Taskforce
> From: COGA Taskforce
> Re: Silver Conformance Models
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed
> conformance models. We recognize they are in an early phase at this point
> and hope that we can continue to talk with you as they progress. Our
> comments at this time are as follows:
>
>    - A very complex scoring system may make it difficult for people with
>    cognitive disabilities to use.  These drafts are so complex right now that
>    it is difficult to review and provide feedback. Whatever solution is
>    suggested, it needs to include plain text alternatives to the formulas and
>    complexity to allow for inclusive review and comment.
>    - Usability testing with individuals with disabilities is a key need
>    to support COGA but there are risks such as difficulty in gaining
>    legislative adoption and the possibility teams will intentionally create
>    less usable systems to ensure "good" usability test results.  Any model
>    should work to reduce these risks while still including usability as an
>    important component.
>    - There is a risk for COGA  in weighting issues by severity as small
>    issues can lead to fatigue but individually would not be "severe."  There
>    is also a risk in measuring by groups as COGA represents a very diverse set
>    of users with overlapping but sometimes distinct user needs. If, for
>    example, visual disabilities are broken out into subgroups such as blind,
>    low vision, and color blind then COGA should also be broken out into
>    distinct such groups such as Dyslexia, Aphasia, Non-verbal - Severe Speech
>    and Language impairments, Aging and Dementia,  Down Syndrome, Autism,
>    Dyscalculia, Anxiety, and Depression.
>    - We also believe that any conformance model should begin with nad map
>    to user needs.
>
> Thank you again,
>
> Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force
>


-- 
Rachael Montgomery, PhD
Director, Accessible Community
rachael@accessiblecommunity.org