- From: Pascalides, Justine E <JPascalides@ETS.ORG>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:38:56 +0000
- To: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>, COGA TF <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <MN2PR07MB68941CC0C5B95FDD318B3393B1900@MN2PR07MB6894.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In considering SC 1.4.8 Visual Presentation, specifically “Text can be resized without assistive technology up to 200 percent in a way that does not require the user to scroll horizontally to read a line of text on a full-screen window<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-on-a-full-screen-window>” how would the implementation of Easy Read interact with this particular SC? Justine From: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 12:46 PM To: COGA TF <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> Subject: for info: how DWP approached Easy Read https://accessibility.blog.gov.uk/2019/10/11/how-dwp-used-the-easy-read-format-to-make-its-content-more-accessible/<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faccessibility.blog.gov.uk%2F2019%2F10%2F11%2Fhow-dwp-used-the-easy-read-format-to-make-its-content-more-accessible%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7C6cc50bf38ea1493ee45308d74e6aa166%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637064092212094335&sdata=VGla%2Fo4RuEwJ08NeOuE8TOlVrs%2FHT2IRV8CiPnmDChs%3D&reserved=0> this made me wonder if we should suggest Easy Read more firmly in our Patterns? what do people think? Steve ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Monday, 14 October 2019 14:40:11 UTC