W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > November 2019

Fwd: WCAG 2.2 status update

From: Rachael Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 20:15:31 -0500
To: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <fc272381-0169-4574-a2a6-8a0400365436@Spark>
Hello,

If you are working on or interested in the 2.2 SC, please take a few minutes to read through this update.

Best regards

Rachael
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Nov 28, 2019, 7:24 PM -0500
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: WCAG 2.2 status update

> Hi everyone,
>
> A quick update on the status of the various SCs we have going:
>
>
> • Focus visible (enhanced): Initial approval of the SC text & documents, these have been made into a Pull Request (PR) on github: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/936
> That will go out for CFC soon.
> • Accessible authentication: Updates made since previous survey, will be up for another review on the 10th Dec.
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/accessible-auth/
> • Essential controls: Some concerns about how to define the visual aspects, which Rachael, Bruce and MichaelG are working on, if they are happy with that we can re-review. There is also a somewhat separate option to add techniques for personalisation once that spec reaches recommendation.
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/target-spacing/
> • Touch target spacing: Worry that it could in some (key) scenarios encourage people to shrink targets and add spacing, rather than increase the spacing per-se. Also some wording suggestions made, summary under the ‘discussion’ heading:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sszSUKB8t3VuRzxHtOjLfQZjNYCw-xr_EbuMwW7WiGc/edit#heading=h.r8bcaho509u5
> Updates needed prior to re-review.
> • Icon Description: Has been updated after previous reviews, needs to be re-scheduled, draft here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HzSsCGelWfz_Z-M7NyUzJOvl1A1kAStyl8epYdpZhoA/edit#
> • Information in steps: Reviewed on Tuesday, up again next week:
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/info-in-steps/
> • Fixed Reference Points: Reviewed on Tuesday, up again next week: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/page-break-nav/
> • Find help: Up for 1st review Dec 10th.
> • Confirmation before submission: Up for 1st review Dec 10th.
> • Visual indicators: Up for 1st review Dec 17th.
> • Dragging: Up for 1st review Jan 7th.
> • Visible labels & Orientation were thought to be possible to cover with understanding/technique updates.
>
> There are a couple more that you can find here:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11IKqjRFvkRd2dAfUiyc5whhB3yIYXvSiirWct7KQIB0/edit#gid=0
> but those are the main ones in progress right now.
> Kind regards,
>
> -Alastair
> --
> www.nomensa.com / @alastc
Received on Friday, 29 November 2019 01:16:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:04 UTC