- From: David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 20:36:58 +0000
- To: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "lwatson@tetralogical.com" <lwatson@tetralogical.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Thank you for the review, and edits, EA. I just implemented them. Information in Steps should be ready to go. I will finish up Persistent Labels later today, and send it out in the same document On 11/5/19, 5:47 AM, "EA Draffan" <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: Thanks so much David and I am returning the document with a few queries and I have to admit that I found the alternative easier to understand. That is "Information provided to or obtained from a user in a multi-step process does not need to be re-entered in a subsequent step unless re-entry is essential [or required to ensure the security of the content)" Best wishes E.A. Mrs E.A. Draffan WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103 http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk -----Original Message----- From: David Fazio [mailto:dfazio@helixopp.com] Sent: 03 November 2019 21:26 To: lwatson@tetralogical.com; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> Subject: Re: WCAG 2.2 COGA SC Information in Steps Ready For Review Edits For everyone that prefers to review this S.C. in a word doc, I made some edits to the Understanding Document online. Here is the revised Word Doc. On 11/3/19, 12:04 PM, "David Fazio" <dfazio@helixopp.com> wrote: Sure thing. I've attached the word doc On 11/3/19, 11:56 AM, "Léonie Watson" <lwatson@tetralogical.com> wrote:
Received on Sunday, 10 November 2019 20:37:05 UTC