Re: WCAG 2.2 acceptance criteria

On 08/03/2019 09:54, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> Steve Lee wrote:
>>   I'd rather drop the time element, as John proposed
> I’m not married to that so long as we have some understanding it will work in the various scenarios John outlined, how about:
> "Can be feasibly tested through a manual or automated processes, and any tools needed to test it are available before the Candidate Recommendation stage."


>>   I also think Glenda's clarification of ways of testing adds value so could be added.
> The descriptions are good, but you look at the bullets in context (given that we've had this massive discussion on 1 out of 8 bullet points), it adds a lot, and we're just trying to clear up that "it is testable".


Only 7 to go.... (joke)


Received on Friday, 8 March 2019 11:30:05 UTC