W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > March 2019

Re: WCAG 2.2 acceptance criteria

From: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 11:30:03 +0000
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org
Message-ID: <bcb61a48-2259-c93f-016a-cc558b6b8cde@w3.org>
On 08/03/2019 09:54, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> Steve Lee wrote:
>>   I'd rather drop the time element, as John proposed
> 
> I’m not married to that so long as we have some understanding it will work in the various scenarios John outlined, how about:
> "Can be feasibly tested through a manual or automated processes, and any tools needed to test it are available before the Candidate Recommendation stage."

+1


>>   I also think Glenda's clarification of ways of testing adds value so could be added.
> 
> The descriptions are good, but you look at the bullets in context (given that we've had this massive discussion on 1 out of 8 bullet points), it adds a lot, and we're just trying to clear up that "it is testable".

OK

Only 7 to go.... (joke)

Steve
Received on Friday, 8 March 2019 11:30:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:02 UTC