- From: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 11:30:03 +0000
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org
On 08/03/2019 09:54, Alastair Campbell wrote: > Steve Lee wrote: >> I'd rather drop the time element, as John proposed > > I’m not married to that so long as we have some understanding it will work in the various scenarios John outlined, how about: > "Can be feasibly tested through a manual or automated processes, and any tools needed to test it are available before the Candidate Recommendation stage." +1 >> I also think Glenda's clarification of ways of testing adds value so could be added. > > The descriptions are good, but you look at the bullets in context (given that we've had this massive discussion on 1 out of 8 bullet points), it adds a lot, and we're just trying to clear up that "it is testable". OK Only 7 to go.... (joke) Steve
Received on Friday, 8 March 2019 11:30:05 UTC